[VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Thomas Andraschko-2
Hi,

based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?", I'd
like to call a vote.

The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
redudant:
@Inject @Web ServletContext.

We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.

1) Should we replace it?
2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?

Regards,
Thomas
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Thomas Andraschko-2
+1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext


2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
> I'd like to call a vote.
>
> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
> redudant:
> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>
> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>
> 1) Should we replace it?
> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:

> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>
>
> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>
>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>> redudant:
>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>
>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>
>> 1) Should we replace it?
>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Antoine Sabot-Durand
+1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.


Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :

> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>
>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>> redudant:
>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>
>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>
>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Mark Struberg
Administrator
+1

The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.

LieGrue,
strub





On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
 
+1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.

>
>
>
>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>
>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>> redudant:
>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>
>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Cody Lerum
+1

To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)

-C

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>
>>
>>
>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>
>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>> redudant:
>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>
>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

john.d.ament
I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
the new qualifier is.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1
>
> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>
> -C
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Romain Manni-Bucau
if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:

> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
> the new qualifier is.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>>
>> -C
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

john.d.ament
I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
>> the new qualifier is.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>>>
>>> -C
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Romain Manni-Bucau
seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:

> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
>>> the new qualifier is.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>>>>
>>>> -C
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

john.d.ament
As per OP email, it's only a proposed value.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
>>>> the new qualifier is.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>>>>>
>>>>> -C
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Romain Manni-Bucau
yes but until now everybody seems ok

if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if
some change their vote, no?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-02-24 21:00 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:

> As per OP email, it's only a proposed value.
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
>>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
>>>>> the new qualifier is.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -C
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?",
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because @Web is
>>>>>>>>>>> redudant:
>>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the future.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Thomas Andraschko-2
+1 Romain


2014-02-24 21:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:

> yes but until now everybody seems ok
>
> if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if
> some change their vote, no?
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 21:00 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> > As per OP email, it's only a proposed value.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> >>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
> >>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
> >>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
> >>>>> the new qualifier is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -C
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
> [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage
> co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [hidden email]> a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> [hidden email]>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really
> need @Web?",
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because
> @Web is
> >>>>>>>>>>> redudant:
> >>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the
> future.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Replace @Web with a common DeltaSpike qualifier

Thomas Andraschko-2
Are you ok with @DeltaSpike, John?
So we could continue with it?


2014-02-26 9:40 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <[hidden email]>:

> +1 Romain
>
>
> 2014-02-24 21:11 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:
>
> yes but until now everybody seems ok
>>
>> if we have multiple proposal we can see if we do another vote or if
>> some change their vote, no?
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-24 21:00 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>> > As per OP email, it's only a proposed value.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> seems we agree on DeltaSpike, no?
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-02-24 17:24 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>> >>> I agree with the use of the name (@DeltaSpike) but to me this vote is
>> >>> not useful unless we actually know what the proposed new name is.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>> if it is global it should be the name of project IMHO
>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2014-02-24 16:54 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[hidden email]>:
>> >>>>> I'm inclined to -1 (veto) this as it's not clear from the vote what
>> >>>>> the new qualifier is.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Cody Lerum <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> To be clear it is @DeltaSpike (capital D capital S)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -C
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Mark Struberg <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> +1
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> The Qualifier itself should sit in core-api.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> LieGrue,
>> >>>>>>> strub
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Monday, 24 February 2014, 11:03, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> +1 for @Deltaspike qualifier : it gives a solution to manage
>> co-existence of DS feature and future CDI standardized DS features.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>Le 24 févr. 2014 à 10:16, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> [hidden email]> a écrit :
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> +1 as well for a global qualifier @DeltaSPike
>> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> [hidden email]>:
>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for @DeltaSpike -> @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> 2014-02-24 9:52 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
>> [hidden email]>:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> based on the discusstion in "Servlet Module - Do we really
>> need @Web?",
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to call a vote.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> The idea is to replace @Web with a common qualifier because
>> @Web is
>> >>>>>>>>>>> redudant:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Inject @Web ServletContext.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> We could also reuse this qualifier for other features in the
>> future.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Should we replace it?
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2) What about the name? @DeltaSpike?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>>
>
>