[VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
17 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Gerhard Petracek-2
Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache DeltaSpike
out.
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).

The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.

Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!

Please note:
This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see [5]).

------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
why..............
------------------------------------------------

Thanks,
Gerhard

[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
[2]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
[3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
[4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
[5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Gerhard Petracek-2
+1

regards,
gerhard



2015-08-10 4:02 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> DeltaSpike out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>
> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note:
> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> [5]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Gerhard
>
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Romain Manni-Bucau
+1
Le 9 août 2015 19:03, "Gerhard Petracek" <[hidden email]> a écrit :

> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2015-08-10 4:02 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> > DeltaSpike out.
> > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
> >
> > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> > They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
> >
> > Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
> >
> > Please note:
> > This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> > [5]).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gerhard
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> > [2]
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> > [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> > [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> > [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Christian Kaltepoth
+1

2015-08-10 4:35 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>:

> +1
> Le 9 août 2015 19:03, "Gerhard Petracek" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2015-08-10 4:02 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> > > DeltaSpike out.
> > > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
> > >
> > > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> > > They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
> > >
> > > Please note:
> > > This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> > > [5]).
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > > and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gerhard
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> > > [2]
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> > > [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> > > [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> > > [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >
> >
>



--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Daniel Cunha
+1

Em segunda-feira, 10 de agosto de 2015, Christian Kaltepoth <
[hidden email]> escreveu:

> +1
>
> 2015-08-10 4:35 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>:
>
> > +1
> > Le 9 août 2015 19:03, "Gerhard Petracek" <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>> a écrit :
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-08-10 4:02 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]
> <javascript:;>>:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> > > > DeltaSpike out.
> > > > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
> > > >
> > > > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> > > > They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
> > > >
> > > > Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
> > > >
> > > > Please note:
> > > > This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes
> (see
> > > > [5]).
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> > > > and why..............
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gerhard
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> > > > [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> > > > [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> > > > [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
> GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
>


--
Best regard,
Daniel Cunha (soro)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Rafael Benevides-2
In reply to this post by Gerhard Petracek-2
+1

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache DeltaSpike
> out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>
> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note:
> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> [5]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
> why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Gerhard
>
> [1]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> [2]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>



--
*Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
JBoss Developer Materials lead
M: +1-919-592-6255



Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at www.redhat.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Harald Wellmann
-1

I'm seeing a bunch of new regressions compared to 1.4.1 in my application
which uses DeltaSpike Data. I'll analyze the issues in more detail and get
back.

Regards,
Harald


2015-08-10 17:31 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[hidden email]>:

> +1
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> DeltaSpike
> > out.
> > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
> >
> > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> > They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
> >
> > Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
> >
> > Please note:
> > This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> > [5]).
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and
> > why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gerhard
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> > [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> > [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> > [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
> JBoss Developer Materials lead
> M: +1-919-592-6255
>
>
>
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at www.redhat.com
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Gerhard Petracek
Administrator
hi harald,

please compare it to v1.4.2

regards,
gerhard



2015-08-10 17:54 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann <[hidden email]>:

> -1
>
> I'm seeing a bunch of new regressions compared to 1.4.1 in my application
> which uses DeltaSpike Data. I'll analyze the issues in more detail and get
> back.
>
> Regards,
> Harald
>
>
> 2015-08-10 17:31 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[hidden email]>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
> > DeltaSpike
> > > out.
> > > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
> > >
> > > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> > > They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
> > >
> > > Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
> > >
> > > Please note:
> > > This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> > > [5]).
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> > and
> > > why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gerhard
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> > > [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> > > [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> > > [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
> > JBoss Developer Materials lead
> > M: +1-919-592-6255
> >
> >
> >
> > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> > See how it works at www.redhat.com
> >
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

John D. Ament
In reply to this post by Gerhard Petracek-2
+1 for now

I'm seeing a bunch of issues w/ data as well like Harald, but in part has
to do with my setup.

John

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache DeltaSpike
> out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>
> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note:
> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
> [5]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
> why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Gerhard
>
> [1]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> [2]
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Harald Wellmann
In reply to this post by Gerhard Petracek
Hi Gerhard,

I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2
broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),

After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported
yesterday were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to
see them with 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have
looked more closely).

The point is, the behaviour of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an
incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not
just mine).

I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an
improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we
need to sort out a couple of issues related to save().

I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.

Regards,
Harald



Am 10.08.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Gerhard Petracek:

> hi harald,
>
> please compare it to v1.4.2
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2015-08-10 17:54 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann <[hidden email]>:
>
>> -1
>>
>> I'm seeing a bunch of new regressions compared to 1.4.1 in my application
>> which uses DeltaSpike Data. I'll analyze the issues in more detail and get
>> back.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harald
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-10 17:31 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
>>> DeltaSpike
>>>> out.
>>>> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>>>>
>>>> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
>>>> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>>>>
>>>> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>>>>
>>>> Please note:
>>>> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
>>>> [5]).
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>> and
>>>> why..............
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gerhard
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
>>>> [2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
>>>> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
>>>> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
>>>> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
>>> JBoss Developer Materials lead
>>> M: +1-919-592-6255
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>>> See how it works at www.redhat.com
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Gerhard Petracek
Administrator
@harald:
it would be great if you create a jira-ticket for the issue + add a test
(which illustrates the issue).

thx & regards,
gerhard



2015-08-11 20:30 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Gerhard,
>
> I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2
> broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),
>
> After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday
> were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with
> 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more
> closely).
>
> The point is, the behaviour of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an
> incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just
> mine).
>
> I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an
> improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need
> to sort out a couple of issues related to save().
>
> I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.
>
> Regards,
> Harald
>
>
>
>
> Am 10.08.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
>
>> hi harald,
>>
>> please compare it to v1.4.2
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-10 17:54 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> -1
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a bunch of new regressions compared to 1.4.1 in my application
>>> which uses DeltaSpike Data. I'll analyze the issues in more detail and
>>> get
>>> back.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Harald
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-08-10 17:31 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache
>>>>>
>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>>
>>>>> out.
>>>>> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
>>>>> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note:
>>>>> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see
>>>>> [5]).
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>>> why..............
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gerhard
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
>>>
>>>> [2]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
>>>>> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
>>>>> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer*
>>>> JBoss Developer Materials lead
>>>> M: +1-919-592-6255
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
>>>> collaboration.
>>>> See how it works at www.redhat.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

MarvinToll
In reply to this post by Harald Wellmann
An update from an unspecified Motor Company:

We made the decision to roll-back from 1.4.2 to 1.4.0 this morning... as we had skipped 1.4.1.

I'd suggest that you pull 1.4.2... as it now appears this release broke about 50 of our Reference Application JUnit tests.

_Marvin


-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Wellmann [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:30 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Hi Gerhard,

I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2 broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),

After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more closely).

The point is, the behavior of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just mine).

I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need to sort out a couple of issues related to save().

I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.

Regards,
Harald




------------------------------------------
|  USA Cell: 248.866.4897
|  Email: Marvin@gtcGroup.com
|  Web: http://MarvinToll.com
|  Skype: marvin.toll
------------------------------------------
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

MarvinToll
Gerhard,

 

We are attempting to provide feedback as we have time.  There was quite a bit of confusion for a couple of days as we naturally presumed our problems were of our own making.

 

So, until such time as Amita (a.k.a. “akm”) is able to get us “back-on-track” and subsequently provide concrete examples… my suggestion was (and is) to remove 1.4.2 from circulation.

 

Note: We would like to think that our problems are similar to Harald’s… however, we have no definitive understanding of Harald’s problems.  Is that available?

 

_Marvin

 

------------------------------------------

|  USA Cell: 248.866.4897

|  Email:  <mailto:[hidden email]> [hidden email]

|  Web:  <http://marvintoll.com/> http://MarvinToll.com

|  Skype: marvin.toll

------------------------------------------

 

Pattern Enabled Development ® (PED) -  <http://pedcentral.com/> http://pedCentral.com

PED seeks to advance Java/JavaScript application construction

by inspiring software engineers with  Pattern First Thinking,

enabling project teams with a Pattern Palette, and harmonizing

enterprise communication with a Unified Pattern Language.

 

From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:13 AM
To: [hidden email]; Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

 

hi marvin,

 

please provide concrete details and maybe even tests which illustrate the issue.

only with such tests, we can improve our test-suite over time.

(if you are facing the same issue as harald: we will fix it with v1.5.1.)

 

regards,

gerhard

 

 

 

2015-08-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> >:

An update from an unspecified Motor Company:

We made the decision to roll-back from 1.4.2 to 1.4.0 this morning... as we had skipped 1.4.1.

I'd suggest that you pull 1.4.2... as it now appears this release broke about 50 of our Reference Application JUnit tests.

_Marvin


-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Wellmann [mailto:[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> ]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:30 PM
To: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Hi Gerhard,

I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2 broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),

After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more closely).

The point is, the behavior of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just mine).


I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need to sort out a couple of issues related to save().

I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.

Regards,
Harald





 

------------------------------------------
|  USA Cell: 248.866.4897
|  Email: Marvin@gtcGroup.com
|  Web: http://MarvinToll.com
|  Skype: marvin.toll
------------------------------------------
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Gerhard Petracek
Administrator
hi marvin,

a released version can't get dropped later on.
(it's important that the commit and release history is immutable.)

therefore we send out a heads-up mail (about two weeks before a
release-vote).
(since we release quite often some projects even have a 2nd ci-job which
executes the test-suite (of the application) against the latest (daily)
snapshot (see [1]) to ensure that they can upgrade to the next version
easily and without a significant overhead.)

regards,
gerhard

[1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/snapshots.html



2015-08-12 16:15 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>:

> Gerhard,
>
>
>
> We are attempting to provide feedback as we have time.  There was quite a
> bit of confusion for a couple of days as we naturally presumed our problems
> were of our own making.
>
>
>
> So, until such time as Amita (a.k.a. “akm”) is able to get us
> “back-on-track” and subsequently provide concrete examples… my suggestion
> was (and is) to remove 1.4.2 from circulation.
>
>
>
> Note: We would like to think that our problems are similar to Harald’s…
> however, we have no definitive understanding of Harald’s problems.  Is that
> available?
>
>
>
> _Marvin
>
>
>
> *------------------------------------------*
>
> *|**  USA Cell:** 248.866.4897 <248.866.4897>*
>
> *|**  Email:* *[hidden email]* <[hidden email]>
>
> *|**  Web:* *http://MarvinToll.com* <http://marvintoll.com/>
>
> *|**  Skype: **marvin.toll*
>
> *------------------------------------------*
>
>
>
> *Pattern Enabled Development* *®** (PED) - **http://pedCentral.com*
> <http://pedcentral.com/>
>
> PED seeks to advance Java/JavaScript application construction
>
> by inspiring software engineers with  Pattern First Thinking,
>
> enabling project teams with a Pattern Palette, and harmonizing
>
> enterprise communication with a Unified Pattern Language.
>
>
>
> *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[hidden email]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:13 AM
> *To:* [hidden email]; Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0
>
>
>
> hi marvin,
>
>
>
> please provide concrete details and maybe even tests which illustrate the
> issue.
>
> only with such tests, we can improve our test-suite over time.
>
> (if you are facing the same issue as harald: we will fix it with v1.5.1.)
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> gerhard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-08-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>:
>
> An update from an unspecified Motor Company:
>
> We made the decision to roll-back from 1.4.2 to 1.4.0 this morning... as
> we had skipped 1.4.1.
>
> I'd suggest that you pull 1.4.2... as it now appears this release broke
> about 50 of our Reference Application JUnit tests.
>
> _Marvin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Wellmann [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:30 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0
>
> Hi Gerhard,
>
> I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2
> broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),
>
> After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday
> were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with
> 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more
> closely).
>
> The point is, the behavior of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an
> incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just
> mine).
>
>
> I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an
> improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need
> to sort out a couple of issues related to save().
>
> I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.
>
> Regards,
> Harald
>
>
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

MarvinToll

Gerhard,

Interesting suggestion... we will consider it.

_Marvin

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

hi marvin,

...

(since we release quite often some projects even have a 2nd ci-job which executes the test-suite (of the application) against the latest (daily) snapshot (see [1]) to ensure that they can upgrade to the next version easily and without a significant overhead.)

regards,
gerhard

[1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/snapshots.html


------------------------------------------
|  USA Cell: 248.866.4897
|  Email: Marvin@gtcGroup.com
|  Web: http://MarvinToll.com
|  Skype: marvin.toll
------------------------------------------
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Mark Struberg
Administrator
In reply to this post by Gerhard Petracek
I hope I’m able to test it tomorrow.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 12.08.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>:
>
> hi marvin,
>
> a released version can't get dropped later on.
> (it's important that the commit and release history is immutable.)
>
> therefore we send out a heads-up mail (about two weeks before a
> release-vote).
> (since we release quite often some projects even have a 2nd ci-job which
> executes the test-suite (of the application) against the latest (daily)
> snapshot (see [1]) to ensure that they can upgrade to the next version
> easily and without a significant overhead.)
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/snapshots.html
>
>
>
> 2015-08-12 16:15 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Gerhard,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are attempting to provide feedback as we have time.  There was quite a
>> bit of confusion for a couple of days as we naturally presumed our problems
>> were of our own making.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, until such time as Amita (a.k.a. “akm”) is able to get us
>> “back-on-track” and subsequently provide concrete examples… my suggestion
>> was (and is) to remove 1.4.2 from circulation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Note: We would like to think that our problems are similar to Harald’s…
>> however, we have no definitive understanding of Harald’s problems.  Is that
>> available?
>>
>>
>>
>> _Marvin
>>
>>
>>
>> *------------------------------------------*
>>
>> *|**  USA Cell:** 248.866.4897 <248.866.4897>*
>>
>> *|**  Email:* *[hidden email]* <[hidden email]>
>>
>> *|**  Web:* *http://MarvinToll.com* <http://marvintoll.com/>
>>
>> *|**  Skype: **marvin.toll*
>>
>> *------------------------------------------*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Pattern Enabled Development* *®** (PED) - **http://pedCentral.com*
>> <http://pedcentral.com/>
>>
>> PED seeks to advance Java/JavaScript application construction
>>
>> by inspiring software engineers with  Pattern First Thinking,
>>
>> enabling project teams with a Pattern Palette, and harmonizing
>>
>> enterprise communication with a Unified Pattern Language.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[hidden email]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 12, 2015 9:13 AM
>> *To:* [hidden email]; Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0
>>
>>
>>
>> hi marvin,
>>
>>
>>
>> please provide concrete details and maybe even tests which illustrate the
>> issue.
>>
>> only with such tests, we can improve our test-suite over time.
>>
>> (if you are facing the same issue as harald: we will fix it with v1.5.1.)
>>
>>
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> gerhard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 Marvin Toll <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> An update from an unspecified Motor Company:
>>
>> We made the decision to roll-back from 1.4.2 to 1.4.0 this morning... as
>> we had skipped 1.4.1.
>>
>> I'd suggest that you pull 1.4.2... as it now appears this release broke
>> about 50 of our Reference Application JUnit tests.
>>
>> _Marvin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harald Wellmann [mailto:[hidden email]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:30 PM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0
>>
>> Hi Gerhard,
>>
>> I compared to 1.4.1 because that's the last known good version, 1.4.2
>> broke my application already (DELTASPIKE-965),
>>
>> After some analysis, I believe the "new regressions" I reported yesterday
>> were introduced in 1.4.2 and not in 1.5.0 - I wasn't able to see them with
>> 1.4.2 due to that first blocker (or maybe I should have looked more
>> closely).
>>
>> The point is, the behavior of EntityRepository.save() has changed in an
>> incompatible way which is likely to break some other applications (not just
>> mine).
>>
>>
>> I now change my vote to +1, seeing that this 1.5.0 candidate is an
>> improvement over 1.4.2, but that does not mean that all is well - we need
>> to sort out a couple of issues related to save().
>>
>> I'll start a separate thread on that, to keep the discussion focused.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harald
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.0

Mark Struberg
Administrator
In reply to this post by Gerhard Petracek-2
+1

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 10.08.2015 um 04:02 schrieb Gerhard Petracek <[hidden email]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the 19th release of Apache DeltaSpike
> out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]).
>
> The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4].
> They will get pushed to the ASF repository once the vote passed.
>
> Please take a look at the 1.5.0 artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note:
> This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see [5]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and
> why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Gerhard
>
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/
> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedeltaspike-1029/org/apache/deltaspike/deltaspike/1.5.0/deltaspike-1.5.0-source-release.zip
> [3] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/deltaspike-1.5.0
> [4] https://github.com/os890/deltaspike-vote/tree/ds-1.5.0
> [5] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes