[DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?

Marius Bogoevici
All,

I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy is
flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I think
it is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be
included in the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be
included now, based on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and
a number of developers I recently encountered have asked about ways to
reuse their existing Spring codebase with the newly available features
in Java EE 6. It is possible to direct people to Seam Spring and such,
however it is clear from the start that those libraries will need to be
replaced soon.

So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page
https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html, but
that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.

I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as possible
next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying
that such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap
(knowing that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from
my point of view this is a critically important item, and can be
addressed now, given how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike
are in place.

WDYT?

Cheers,
Marius
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?

Romain Manni-Bucau
IMO cdi-query is more important than any integration with a third party
(spring, osgi..)

Wdyt?
Le 6 juil. 2012 21:21, "Marius Bogoevici" <[hidden email]> a
écrit :

> All,
>
> I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy is
> flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I think it
> is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be included in
> the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be included now, based
> on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and a number of developers
> I recently encountered have asked about ways to reuse their existing Spring
> codebase with the newly available features in Java EE 6. It is possible to
> direct people to Seam Spring and such, however it is clear from the start
> that those libraries will need to be replaced soon.
>
> So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
> design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/**
> DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-**integration.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html>,
> but that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.
>
> I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as possible
> next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying that
> such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap (knowing
> that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from my point of
> view this is a critically important item, and can be addressed now, given
> how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike are in place.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Cheers,
> Marius
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?

Marius Bogoevici
On 12-07-06 3:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> IMO cdi-query is more important than any integration with a third party
> (spring, osgi..)
>
> Wdyt?
I think that one shouldn't exclude the other, as committers and
contributors can focus on different areas of interest.

> Le 6 juil. 2012 21:21, "Marius Bogoevici" <[hidden email]> a
> écrit :
>
>> All,
>>
>> I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy is
>> flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I think it
>> is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be included in
>> the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be included now, based
>> on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and a number of developers
>> I recently encountered have asked about ways to reuse their existing Spring
>> codebase with the newly available features in Java EE 6. It is possible to
>> direct people to Seam Spring and such, however it is clear from the start
>> that those libraries will need to be replaced soon.
>>
>> So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
>> design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/**
>> DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-**integration.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html>,
>> but that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.
>>
>> I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as possible
>> next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying that
>> such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap (knowing
>> that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from my point of
>> view this is a critically important item, and can be addressed now, given
>> how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike are in place.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marius
>>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?

Mark Struberg
Administrator
go for it marius.

I'd say we try to get 0.3-incubating out of the door next week?
And then we can freely add all that stuff.

LieGrue,
strub



----- Original Message -----

> From: Marius Bogoevici <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Cc: Romain Manni-Bucau <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, July 6, 2012 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-spring in v0.4 ?
>
> On 12-07-06 3:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>  IMO cdi-query is more important than any integration with a third party
>>  (spring, osgi..)
>>
>>  Wdyt?
> I think that one shouldn't exclude the other, as committers and
> contributors can focus on different areas of interest.
>>  Le 6 juil. 2012 21:21, "Marius Bogoevici"
> <[hidden email]> a
>>  écrit :
>>
>>>  All,
>>>
>>>  I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy
> is
>>>  flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I
> think it
>>>  is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be included
> in
>>>  the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be included now,
> based
>>>  on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and a number of
> developers
>>>  I recently encountered have asked about ways to reuse their existing
> Spring
>>>  codebase with the newly available features in Java EE 6. It is possible
> to
>>>  direct people to Seam Spring and such, however it is clear from the
> start
>>>  that those libraries will need to be replaced soon.
>>>
>>>  So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
>>>  design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page
> https://cwiki.apache.org/**
>>>
> DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-**integration.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html>,
>>>  but that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.
>>>
>>>  I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as
> possible
>>>  next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying
> that
>>>  such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap (knowing
>>>  that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from my
> point of
>>>  view this is a critically important item, and can be addressed now,
> given
>>>  how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike are in place.
>>>
>>>  WDYT?
>>>
>>>  Cheers,
>>>  Marius
>>>
>